No. 25-322
Dimitry Kuperschmidt v. Jeff Angradi, Chief Probation Officer, et al.
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-11-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Pennsylvania appellate court rule on which the District Court relied to find procedural default a 'firmly established' and 'consistently followed' one within habeas precedent?
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was the Pennsylvania appellate court rule on which the District Court relied to find procedural default a “firmly established” and “consistently followed” one within habeas precedent? 2. Can the “in custody” requirement ever be waived or excused?
Docket Entries
2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 20, 2025)
2025-07-22
Application (25A80) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 14, 2025.
2025-07-16
Application (25A80) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 16, 2025 to September 14, 2025, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Dimitry Kuperschmidt
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner