No. 25-334

Satyasheel S. Korpe v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: article-iii driving-while-intoxicated jury-trial probation-conditions second-amendment-rights sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Sixth Amendment and Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution guarantee a defendant charged with Driving While Intoxicated the right to a jury trial when facing up to six months imprisonment and probationary conditions that include loss of Second Amendment rights?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Does the Sixth Amendment and Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution, guarantee a defendant charged with Driving While Intoxicated the right to a jury trial even when he faces only up to six months imprisonment? 2. Does the Sixth Amendment and Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution, guarantee a defendant charged with Driving While Intoxicated the right to a jury trial when he faces up to six months imprisonment and standard probationary conditions, which include loss of his Second Amendment right for a year?

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 22, 2025)

Attorneys

Satyasheel Korpe
Chris LeibigLaw Office of Christopher Leibig, Petitioner
Chris LeibigLaw Office of Christopher Leibig, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent