No. 25-336

Elsie Franklin v. Kentucky

Lower Court: Kentucky
Docketed: 2025-09-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: adequate-opportunity confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination evidence-standard prior-testimony
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2025-11-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What constitutes an 'adequate opportunity' for cross-examination under Crawford v. Washington when new evidence emerges after initial testimony

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

In Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S. 36 (2004), this Court held that, under the Confrontation Clause, an unavailable witness’s prio r testimony “is admissible only if the defendant had an adequate opportunity to cross-examine.” Id. at 57. Despite Confrontation Clause issues arising quite often since then and despite lower courts continuing to grapple with trying to figure out what this Court meant by “adequate opportunity,” the Court has yet to define what it means by “adequate opportunity” or to otherwise provide guidance on how to determine what constitutes an “adequate opportunity,” including but not lim ited to, how to determine if prior cross exam ination opportunities were adequate when new evidence came to light after the initial opportunity to cross examine that, if known beforehand, would lead an objectively reasonable attorney to have further cross examined the witness using that evidence. With no procedural impediments to the Court’s review, the questions presented that were squarely presented to, and decided by, the lower court are: 1. What does Crawford v. Washington mean by “adequate opportunity” to cross examine, and how shall a lower court go about dete rmining whether a defendant had an “adequate opportunity”? 2. Is a prior opportunity to cross examine not an “adequate opport unity” under Crawford and the Confrontation Clause in the common situation where new information came to light between that opportunity and the eventual trial? 3. When a mistrial occurs during the prior testimony, is the first portion of the cross examination an “adequate opportunity” to cross examine? ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Supreme Court of Kentucky No. 2023 -SC -0472 -MR Elsie Franklin, Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellee. Date of Memorandum Opinion: June 20, 2025 _ Anderson Circuit Court, 53rd Judicial Circuit No. 19 -CR -00067 Commonwealth of Kentucky, Plaintiff, v. Elsie S. Franklin, Defendant. Date of Verdict & Judgment Signed: September 26, 2023; Entered: September 27, 2023

Docket Entries

2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2025)

Attorneys

Elsie Franklin
John Gerhart LandonLandon Law PLLC, Petitioner
John Gerhart LandonLandon Law PLLC, Petitioner