Did corruption within the NJ judiciary violate the petitioner's constitutional rights and foster impropriety in judicial proceedings?

1. Did corruption within the NJ judiciary violate the ’s constitutional rights? 2. Why was the Appellate team switched to all individuals who were Alma Maters with NJ Superior Court Judge Robert H. Gardner (his decision was on appeal), from the Part D team, consisting of all former victims ’ advocates, with no common thread to Judge Gardner (Greta Gooden-Brown, Stephanie Ann Mitterhoff and Michael J. Haas) to serve the interest of Judge Gardner, over that of the petitioner plaintiff? ii The Alma Maters were also from the same practice region as Judge Gardner (Whipple, Mayer and Enright). 3. Did Judge Whipple ’s appointment on the NJ Supreme Court, at the time of its decision not iii 4. to hear this matter, concerning her corruption, foster impropriety on part of the NJ Supreme Court? a. Could a reasonable person expect objectivity from the Supreme Court, in light of this? 5. Was Judge Gardner still worthy of the bench, after having ruled against ADA Access to NJ voting centers? 6. What effect should fraud have on a settlement agreement? 7. Should Judge Messano have recused himself from presiding over the appeal; practically being from the same town, and country club as defense counsel and defendant? 8. Did favoritism play a role, in the Appellate court changing the defendant ’s caption to his iv 9. initials, to protect his identity as an alleged child molester. The rules clearly require a motion for a protective Order; however, no such motion was ever filed. Did his connection to the member of the NJ Appellate Division bring about this favor?