No. 25-375
CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-review appellate-procedure federal-circuit patent-law rule-36 statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Patent Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Patent Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Federal Circuit Rule 36 violates 35 U.S.C. § 144 by allowing affirmance without opinion when reviewing Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Federal Circuit Rule 36, which allows the United States Court of Appeals for the Fede ral Circuit to issue an affirmance without opinion when reviewing a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) violates the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 144, which requires that the Federal Circuit issue an “opinion” when reviewing a PTO decision.
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent Apple Inc. to respond filed.
2025-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2025)
Attorneys
Apple Inc.
Brian Robert Matsui — Morrison & Foerster LLP, Respondent
Brian Robert Matsui — Morrison & Foerster LLP, Respondent
CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd.
George Clark Summerfield Jr. — K&L Gates LLP, Petitioner
George Clark Summerfield Jr. — K&L Gates LLP, Petitioner