(1) Whether a district court must consider a qui tam relator's substantial commitment of time and money when weighing the Government's expected burden under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), as required by this Court's decision in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.

(2) Whether a district court violates the separation of powers by ordering the United States to intervene in or dismiss a qui tam action, thereby intruding into the Executive Branch's prosecutorial discretion under the False Claims Act.

Question not identified.