No. 25-449
Stephen Thaler v. Shira Perlmutter, Register of Copyrights and Director of the United States Copyright Office, et al.
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: ai-generated-works artificial-intelligence authorship copyright-law creative-works intellectual-property
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Antitrust Copyright Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Antitrust Copyright Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-02-27
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether works outputted by an AI system without a direct, traditional authorial contribution by a natural person can be copyrighted
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether works outputted by an AI system without a direct, traditional authorial contribution by a natural person can be copyrighted.
Docket Entries
2026-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/27/2026.
2026-02-09
Reply of petitioner Stephen Thaler filed. (Distributed)
2026-02-09
Reply of Stephen Thaler submitted.
2026-02-04
Amicus brief of Lea Victoria Bishop submitted.
2026-01-26
Brief amicus curiae of Lea Bishop filed.
2026-01-23
Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.
2026-01-23
Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition submitted.
2025-12-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 26, 2026.
2025-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2025 to January 26, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-18
Motion of Federal Respondents for an extension of time submitted.
2025-11-26
Response Requested. (Due December 26, 2025)
2025-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-12
Brief amici curiae of Phyllis Schlafly Eagles, et al. filed.
2025-10-31
Letter from counsel for petitioner received.
2025-10-31
Brief amici curiae of Prof. Shlomit Yanisky-Ravid, et al. filed.
2025-10-31
Amicus brief of Prof. Shlomit Yanisky-Ravid, Proof. Lawrence Lessig, Dr. Patrica Vargas Leon, Dr. Ge Chen, Dr. Eirliani Abdul Rahman, Prof. Jonathan Marcelinus D’Silva, Penn State Dickinson Law School IP Clinic and 5 Others submitted.
2025-10-31
Motion other – Request for Hold of Stephen Thaler submitted.
2025-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
2025-10-28
Waiver of Federal Respondents of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2025)
2025-07-23
Application (25A82) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 9, 2025.
2025-07-17
Application (25A82) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 10, 2025 to October 9, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Federal Respondents
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Lea Bishop
Lea Victoria Bishop — Acumen Auctorum, Amicus
Lea Victoria Bishop — Acumen Auctorum, Amicus
Lea Victoria Bishop
Lea Victoria Bishop — Acumen Auctorum, Amicus
Perlmutter, Shira, et al.
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Phyllis Schlafly Eagles and Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund
Andrew L. Schlafly — Amicus
Andrew L. Schlafly — Amicus
Andrew L. Schlafly — Amicus
Prof. Shlomit Yanisky-Ravid, Proof. Lawrence Lessig, Dr. Patrica Vargas Leon, Dr. Ge Chen, Dr. Eirliani Abdul Rahman, Prof. Jonathan Marcelinus D’Silva, Penn State Dickinson Law School IP Clinic and 5 Others
Stephen Thaler
Ryan Benjamin Abbott — Brown, Neri, Smith and Khan, LLP, Petitioner
Ryan Benjamin Abbott — Brown, Neri, Smith and Khan, LLP, Petitioner
Ryan Benjamin Abbott — Brown, Neri, Smith and Khan, LLP, Petitioner