No. 25-468
Walter Rosales, et al. v. Condon-Johnson Associates, Inc.
Tags: district-court federal-claims futility-exception remand statutory-interpretation supplemental-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2025-12-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a District Court have supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1367 to dismiss a proffered amended complaint deleting all federal claims pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's 'futility exception,' despite Congress having made remand of such an amended complaint mandatory under 28 U.S.C. §1447(c)?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a Dis trict Court have supplemental juris diction under 28 U.S.C. '1367 to dismiss a prof fered amended complaint deleting all federal claims pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s “futility exception,” despite Congress having made remand of such an amended complaint m andatory under 28 U.S.C. '1447(c)?
Docket Entries
2025-12-15
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-24
Reply of petitioners Walter Rosales, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-11-21
Reply of Walter Rosales submitted.
2025-11-07
Brief of Condon-Johnson Assoc., Inc. in opposition submitted.
2025-11-07
Brief of respondent Condon-Johnson Assoc., Inc. in opposition filed.
2025-11-07
Brief of respondent Condon-Johnson & Associates, Inc., in opposition filed.
2025-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 17, 2025)
Attorneys
Condon-Johnson Assoc., Inc.
Kendra J. Hall — Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP, Respondent
Kendra J. Hall — Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP, Respondent
Walter Rosales
Patrick D. Webb — Law Offices of Patrick D. Webb, Petitioner
Patrick D. Webb — Law Offices of Patrick D. Webb, Petitioner