No. 25-475

Jason Camp v. Los Angeles Unified School District

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-10-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: educational-funding federal-education-law regulatory-compliance school-district-manipulation statutory-interpretation title-i-funding
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a school district's deliberate manipulation of federal Title I enrollment counts to maximize funding allocations while systematically diverting funds from disadvantaged students violates Title I's mandatory allocation requirements

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Whether a school dist rict’s deliberate manipu lation of federal Title I enrollment counts to maximize funding allocations—while systematically diverting those funds from the disadvantaged students who generated them—violates Title I’s mandatory allocation requirements under 34 C.F.R. §§ 200.78(a)(1) and 200.78(b)(1), regardless of wh ether a regulation specific ally prohibits the district’s precise manipulation scheme. 2. Whether the California Court of Appeal’s requirement that Ti tle I violations can only occur when regulations specifically prohibit an employer’s exact manipulation scheme conflicts with this Court’s prece dent in Bennett v. Kentucky Department of Education , 470 U.S. 656 (1985), which held Title I violations require repayment regardless of whether specific regulations prohibit the precise conduct. 3. Whether federal courts may effectively immu nize systematic subversion of Title I’s fundamental regulatory framework—including the rank -order allocation requirement of 34 C.F.R. § 200.78(a)(1) and the per -pupil minimum of 34 C.F.R. § 200.78(b)(1)— by requiring identification of regulations that anticipate each specific method of manipulation, thereby creating a dangerous safe harbor for creative violations of Title I’s comprehensive regulatory scheme. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS California Supreme Court No. S290506 Jason Camp , Plaintiff and Appellant v. Los Angeles Unified School District, Defendant and Appellant Petition for Review Denial : July 16, 2025 _ California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five No. B318925, B321227 (consolidated) Jason Camp , Plaintiff and Appellant v. Los Angeles Unified School District, Defendant and Appellant Opinion : March 25, 2025 Petition for Rehearing Denial : April 11, 2025 _ Los Angeles County Superior Court No. BC673403 Jason Camp, Plaintiff v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al., Defendants Judgment November 3, 2021

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-26
2025-11-26
Reply of petitioner Jason Camp filed.
2025-11-17
Brief of Los Angeles Unified School District in opposition submitted.
2025-11-17
Brief of respondent Los Angeles Unified School District in opposition filed.
2025-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 17, 2025)

Attorneys

Jason Camp
Renuka Vinchurkar JainLaw Offices of Renuka V. Jain, P.C., Petitioner
Renuka Vinchurkar JainLaw Offices of Renuka V. Jain, P.C., Petitioner
Los Angeles Unified School District
Melinda CantrallHurrell Cantrall LLP, Respondent
Melinda CantrallHurrell Cantrall LLP, Respondent