Whether the District Court and Appellate Court erred in denying petitioner's motion to intervene and addressing claims of a climate change 'hoax'

This petition seeks the urgent intervention of this Court to address the worst Hoax in history and put an end to all its litigations, which is the claims that “burning fossil fuels and generating CO2 is causing harmful global warming” (not arguing if there is global warming or not). Petitioner believes that the lower Courts were afraid to declare the reality of the Hoax. Such declaration could result in the prosecution of numerous public officials and entities, allegedly misappropriating hundreds of billions of dollars in public resources to support the Hoax. The fraud and corruption reached unprecedented levels, with people using the courts to grab the fraudulent funds (as if making it legal), and some Attorneys General potentially complicit in the Hoax. In many instances, courts were claimed to have facilitated the Hoax, disregarding scientific evidence that challenges its validity, even the simple evidence that a six-year-old can understand. The petitioner, having recognized this fraud, has initiated legal actions against various officials and entities and sought to intervene in related cases. He challenged, and is challenging the Hoax, without anyone daring to oppose his facts, instead, they wrongfully attacked his standing and procedures. Questions Presented: I. Did the District Court and Appellate Court err in denying petitioner’s motion to intervene? II. Did the District Court and Appellete Court err in failing to address petitioner’s opposition to the Hoax? Ill. Should a citizen have the right to prosecute law enforcement or public officials for alleged corruption? IV. Courts should reduce the amount of paperwork. i