Whether federal district and bankruptcy court professional speech local rules creating a nationwide patchwork of conflicting licensing standards violate the Rules Enabling Act's uniformity requirements and constitutional freedoms

Whether federal district and bankruptcy court professional speech local (sic) rules—that create a nationwide patchwork of conflicting licensing standards, effectively imposing nationwide injunctions on the practice rights of qualified attorneys in violation of the Rules Enabling Act’s uniformity requirements and Trump v. Casa ’s prohibition on lower court nationwide injunctions and the First Amendment freedoms to speech, association, and to petition the government for the redress of grievances—are subject to rational basis review?