No. 25-5012

Gregory Ifesinachi Ezeani v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2025-07-02
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : 1. QUESTION (S) PRESENTED 1. Procedural due process violation of Hobb's administrative review act 28 U.S. Code Chapter 158 orders of federal Agencies. The third circuit court denied reviewing final order of deportation of the immigration judge that the judge openly used suppression of material evidence submitted to court by a social worker hired by the immigration court. The error was affirmed by the board of Immigration appeal (BIA) without a fair trial of a suppressed document in their possession. 2. The third circuit court denied reviewing suppression of material evidence by the immigration judge affirmed by board of Immigration appeal when it is clearly beyond reasonable doubt that the immigration judge used suppression which is inconsistent with supreme court previous decision on suppression of material evidence of a plaintiff. See United States v. Baglev 2

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2025-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-30
Waiver of Bondi, Att'y Gen. of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent Bondi, Att'y Gen. to respond filed.
2025-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2025)
2024-12-06
Application (24A544) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 20, 2025.
2024-11-26
Application (24A544) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 19, 2025 to March 20, 2025, submitted to Justice Alito.
2024-11-26
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Attorneys

Bondi, Att'y Gen.
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor KabaHueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent
Gregory I. Ezeani
Gregory Ifesinachi Ezeani — Petitioner
Gregory Ifesinachi Ezeani — Petitioner