No. 25-5038
Nicholas Weir v. Montefiore Medical Center, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: attorney-deceit collateral-estoppel federal-jurisdiction judicial-procedure new-york-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-11-14
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal courts should recognize the cursory nature of facts to prevent collateral estoppel under Marrese and 28 U.S.C. § 1738 in attorney deceit cases
Question Presented (from Petition)
If Marrese v. Am. Acad, of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 380 (1985) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1738 are controlling, should the Federal Court recognize the cursory nature of facts shielding them from being barred by collateral estoppel under Dunn, (N.Y. 2015) and the liberal nature of New York Judiciary Law section 487 to permit a plenary action for attorney deceit under Marta Urias v. Daniel P. Buttafuoco, 18 (NY 2024)? ii
Docket Entries
2025-11-17
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
2025-10-24
Petitioner complied with order of October 6, 2025.
2025-10-06
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 27, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2025-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-05-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2025)
2024-05-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2025)