No. 25-5045

Raymond Dean Ordoukhanian v. Leah Wommack Chaney, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-07-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-violation due-process evidence-fabrication habeas-corpus judicial-misconduct prosecutorial-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether prosecutors who intentionally alter facts and evidence with bad faith should be immune from legal consequences when exculpatory evidence is discovered years later during post-conviction review

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

(CONT.) PG. 2 of 2 3. The question of great importance to this Supreme Court of The United States of America, is the question of tyranny, and what differentiates us from a totalitarian run justice ;/ system wherein a person's liberty and freedom can be removed fromian entity that has learned over years of trial and error to utilize "due process" tactics of suppression and fabrication, with little or no repercussions, even it is repeated, and will this Highest Court with the authority to correct, be "[t]he only Maxim of a free government ought to be, to trust no man Living with Power to endanger the Public Liberty," [P.J.A.], and, "[B]ut let no person say what they would or would not do, since we are not judges for ourselves until circumstances call us to act," [F.L.A.A.], as this opportunity to correct is presented? 99

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 7, 2025)

Attorneys

Raymond D. Ordoukhanian
Raymond Dean Ordoukhanian — Petitioner