Raymond Dean Ordoukhanian v. Leah Wommack Chaney, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether prosecutors who intentionally alter facts and evidence with bad faith should be immune from legal consequences when exculpatory evidence is discovered years later during post-conviction review
(CONT.) PG. 2 of 2 3. The question of great importance to this Supreme Court of The United States of America, is the question of tyranny, and what differentiates us from a totalitarian run justice ;/ system wherein a person's liberty and freedom can be removed fromian entity that has learned over years of trial and error to utilize "due process" tactics of suppression and fabrication, with little or no repercussions, even it is repeated, and will this Highest Court with the authority to correct, be "[t]he only Maxim of a free government ought to be, to trust no man Living with Power to endanger the Public Liberty," [P.J.A.], and, "[B]ut let no person say what they would or would not do, since we are not judges for ourselves until circumstances call us to act," [F.L.A.A.], as this opportunity to correct is presented? 99