Whether a US District Court violates due process by denying a plaintiff the use of a pseudonym after state expungement of an arrest record and by excluding service of a complaint involving expungement

1: When an expungemnet has been grranted for an arrest by a state agengy, FDLE, and state court, Florida 18th Circuit, for protections as per the Fourth Amendment, Florida Expungerment Statutes Sections 943.0585 and 943.059 along with Florida Admin Code., (FAC), Chap. 11C-7.006 and 11C-7.007, is it a due process violation for US District Court, Northern Florida District Court, to deny the plaintiff the use of a pseudonym for continued Fourth Amendment, Florda Expungement Statutes, and FAC protections when seeking relief for damages of the arrest? Question 2: Is it a violation of due process for a US District Court, Northern Florida District Court, to exclude service of the complaint, involving an expungement, onto defendant, FDLE, prior to making a decision denying plaintiff the use of a pseudonym? Question 3: Is US Distruct Court for Northern Florida in citing 'Doe v. Garland', 341 F.D.R. 116, 117-18 (S.D. Ga. 2021) (citing 'Francis' 631, 3d at 1316) and the other cases cited in July 15, 2022 'Order 1 insufficient for making a decision to deny the use of a pseudonym because it genrates a conflict between such case(s), and, the Florida Statutes along with FL Administrative Code for granting an expungement? Question 4: Is 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(3) invalid to determine a case on appeal, as frivolous when, having done so fails to consider Constitutional contradictions and procedural errors?