No. 25-5068

Dwayne Anderson v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2025-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: bill-of-particulars constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Dwayne Anderson's right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him violated when the state failed to provide him a bill of particulars upon his request, and was his right to due process of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments violated when the Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction despite showing prejudice?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Was Dwayne Anderson ’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him violated when the state failed to provide him a bill of particulars upon his request? 2. Was Dwayne Anderson's right to due process of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments violated when the Ohio Court of Appealsaffirmed his conviction despite Anderson requesting a bill of particulars, not receiving one in contravention of Ohio law, and showing prejudice as a result of the state ’s failure?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2025)

Attorneys

Dwayne Anderson
Dwayne Anderson — Petitioner