Whether, in assessing direct-review counsel's performance based upon the omission of a preserved issue, lower courts should either apply the clearly stronger test, which compares exclusively the relative strengths of presented and omitted issues, or apply a reasonableness test that incorporates factors such as counsel's experience, judgment, and motivations?

Whether, in assessing direct -review counsel’s performance based upon the omission of a preserved issue, lower courts should either apply the clearly strong er test, which compares exclusively the relative strengths of presented and omitted issues, or apply a reasonableness test that incorporates factors such as counsel’s experience, judgment , and motivations ?