No. 25-5082

Jake Bylsma v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2025-07-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review bankruptcy-fraud judicial-misconduct real-estate-fraud state-corruption third-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a Real Estate and Bankruptcy Fraud racket operated by the Pennsylvania Judicial Elite a compelling reason for Supreme Court review?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

At its base root; this case involves a Real Estate and Bankruptcy Fraud racket OPERATED BY select members of the Pennsylvania judicial elite that includes the State Governor. In order to protect this racket; the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit wildly departed from the accepted and usual course of proceedings from all 13 Federal Appellate Courts, including its own in which Justice Alito ruled on the precedential case as a then3rd Circuit Judge. Without the intervention of THIS MOST SUPREME OF COURTS, this Real Estate and Bankruptcy racket, which has the blatant ability to hide the attempted murders of those exposing it, will continue to operate with impunity against the interests and safety of the Citizens of the United States. The Question Presented; Is a Real Estate and Bankruptcy Fraud racket operated by the Pennsylvania Judicial Elite, aided and abetted by the Pennsylvania Federal Middle District and the Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals, a compelling enough reason for THIS COURT to grant review?

Docket Entries

2026-01-15
Case considered closed.
2025-10-06
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 27, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2025-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 11, 2025)

Attorneys

Jake Bylsma
Jake Bylsma — Petitioner