Whether the First and Fourteenth Amendments are meaningless for a United States citizen under Rule 41 and constitutional interpretation

Does Logic disqualify Judicial actions? References Appellate Case: 24-3437 Date Filed: 12/05/2024 Entry ID: 5463070. Statutory provisions Is the first and the fourteenth Amendment meaningless in the Constitution for a Citizen of United States with Rule 41 argument? Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219, 229 (1988); Spencer v. Doe, 139 F. 3d 107 Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1998; Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n of Fla., 480 US 136 Supreme Court 1987. Is the first and the fourteenth Amendment meaningless in the Constitution for a Citizen of United States? Sherbert v. Verner, 374 US 398 Supreme Court 1963; Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 187 (1961); Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857); Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214, 218 (1944). Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, 98 (1884); Tick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 369 (1886). Page 2 of 34