Awad Mustafa v. HTS Services, Inc., et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Whether the state's trial court has jurisdiction to hear this case with its federal claims, and whether the trial court's dismissal with prejudice violates the Due Process and Supremacy Clauses
1Whether the state ’s trial court has jurisdiction to hear this case with its federal claims, and whether the trial court ’s final judgment to dismiss with prejudice, all claims against all defendants for lack of jurisdiction, is in violation of the Due Process Clause and the Supremacy Clause. 2Whether the trial court ’s Order to Grant TWC ’s plea to the jurisdiction, without i, pn offering the petitioner an opportunity to (at least hear) the plea or to respond to it in a Live Hearing, is in violation of the Due Process Clause, and the Right to be Heard. 3Whether the Texas Workforce Commission ’s clear procedural errors violated the Due Process Clause, and the Right to be Heard, when the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) (reversed the decision) which qualified the petitioner to receive unemployment benefits, before and without processing the (already filed) with the Texas Workforce Commission, the employer/ respondent ’s (HTS) appeal from the qualifying decision. 4Whether the petitioner is entitled, under the Due Process Clause, to move to disqualify or recuse the impartial, bias and prejudice appeals court ’s justice(s), and whether the petitioner was deprived by the Texas supreme court from the right to appeal the appealable denied motion. 5Whether the Texas supreme court's Denials to the direct appeal/the petition for review, and the motion for rehearing with its federal claims, are in violation of the Supremacy Clause.