Anthony Michael Laporte v. United States
1. Can rehabilitation efforts, when combined with other issues, constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason to reduce a sentence?
2. Can the district court deny a sentence reduction based on the Bureau of Prisons failure to provide specific mental health treatment to the defendant?
3. Can a sentencing disparity qualify as an extraordinary and compelling reason to reduce a sentence?
Can rehabilitation efforts, combined with other issues, constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason to reduce a sentence; can the district court deny a sentence reduction based on the Bureau of Prisons' failure to provide specific mental health treatment; and can a sentencing disparity qualify as an extraordinary and compelling reason to reduce a sentence?