No. 25-5109

In Re Maria Dolores Navarro Martin

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-07-15
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: discretionary-power due-process federal-declaratory-judgment immigration-law jurisdiction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. The question presented is whether the District Court had jurisdiction of this
suit under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act.

2. Whether The Attorney General, exercised his discretion under the §
914.22(l)(a) Fla. Stat., to make individualized determinations of
inadmissibility under an unconstitutional state statute of conviction, and

3. Whether the Immigration judge and ICE officials exercised this broad
discretion under the statutes and regulations under an unconstitutional
state statute of conviction no stated in "the Notice to appear" and if it will
be remanded to determine whether petitioner was afforded due process.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court had jurisdiction under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act and whether the Attorney General and Immigration officials exercised proper discretion under Florida statutes regarding inadmissibility and due process

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2025-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-04-08

Attorneys

Maria Dolores Navarro Martin
Maria Navarro Martin — Petitioner