No. 25-5116
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure drug-trafficking due-process evidence-sufficiency firearm-possession reasonable-doubt
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a conviction must be vacated when evidence of firearm possession in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime is based on speculation and conjecture instead of rational inferences
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. DUE PROCESS REQUIRES SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO ALLOW A RATIONAL JURY TO FIND GUILT BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. WHERE THE EVIDENCE THAT A FIREARM WAS POSSESSED IN FURTHERANCE OF A DRUG TRAFFICKING CRIME WAS BASED ON SPECULATION AND CONJECTURE INSTEAD OF RATIONAL INFERENCES, MUST THE CONVICTION FOR COUNT 4 BE VAC ATED? iii PARTIES All parties in the Sixth Circuit proceeding are identified in the caption. Petitioner is an individual and no corporation has an interest in this case
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-22
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2025)
Attorneys
Mark Ellis
James Nicholas Bostic — Bostic & Associates, Petitioner
James Nicholas Bostic — Bostic & Associates, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent