No. 25-5118

George Hamilton v. California Department of General Services, Government Claims Program, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law constitutional-rights due-process government-claims mental-health-claims procedural-safeguards
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Office of General Services' Government Claims Program violate due process by failing to process mental health claims filed by petitioner?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

lohe-HeK “+h£z wX op 0>Newi ^sepvdce^ GoVgh^M M6kHcLAimS f3^o^l i?AM / FA i LuiQe Xo process] zvivd PRov?de pcdXceJ op F^d C L A t HI Qs) z i kj ComPLi am Ce Ot? i ~Ho 4d>e — &%L ^FoRbJi'^ POVGt^iQh^^KH CLAIMS ACX z c COct/fe^ %lO s&^/V ioLat^ ~Hn£> 14Tln AMeNcL due tftoc&ss C LAUS A CCoRd i N p Xo dh 6> P® f M C t P Lg>S e HU Ki Ci"irJ ~ LOPAM V>Z iHM^MAN 6/QU3h COjJOZ S.C+. //4-S CllZZ) ? ) BAS<£cl oi\j such .sSf^Vte'FAiLuRCS diV&&p pe4?4-i'0KJ^e op MUL+rpLe pe^oNAL ppop&^py im4^rc ^s~Ls ppouNideci ?m caL?f. c?i/iL Code> & *753 /does dhe> s4-aX^> hAUC? a d^XY Xu APFOPd 4hez due^ Process PpoceduPAL SAFeFUA^d'S M Awd AXed jX— MAXH?eUJ-S VS BL“ d^?dGe z42X U .So 3/?( P ) uwdfcK fo^UM^ cLa.mS Ac+^oe^ 4he i>efX. oF Fe nj&r a L ^e> vi ces go m mclX ' CLAIMS PROGRAM/ hAl/e A duXY Xo PROCESS q>u£a4i GMOs') (cdnM-) Awd Mo-Hpj* s-f-zY-he/ — c^KHn4ies oF cLai'hCs) P?L8c| AG-A ?KJ-H■fUCM Z R&POR.-HMG( |) MUbH FIX V I oLaHokJS of due procj &ss s+ancIapcLs sHFcfh Vi IM GoldbergV» KeLLY , 347 u. s . 2.54 11 70) z Ch) ipe-pKt ua4"?oms oF G-^oumc IbcI ?n , LAm?(4z u .SX^/376ai C<)03);42 C.P.i^.^ ^SLzzoCsD/^SH^^fF)) f Doe>s any 8X13+^.3^ UNcjei^ Gonzaga UN(yt v.W z53b M.5^ Z730zooz)) z *'M ORde^ z For PehH^oNe^ 4-o Co^PeL Pe>PLFo£MAMCez oF Such 3)MS'! 8>3 Does -H<\e .w/p-H of gene^AL z G0V£>^K)M8?M4cLAjMS PROGRAM / ^I^GAee Tm A {cokM'i'NU JnipJ PA++e^N OF Ac4noM z v?cLa-Hmp dueR^oce^ss cLaU~SBz bY PAibi MG 4o I PKO Ce^SS A 9^’^dJ Piled Pov^RMMe>M4cLaTm f 3>oes i'(e oePFc op GeM^pAi se?^ui'ee^> z £OV0iWHeKH~ cLamms program z Cau3€^ 3 X ± 7 -'S P £ 8 *T -h$ O Z zo> o > $ Ft ? z i % > +</ C4<5> c o'& £ 6O’ <jn ■± <r s § Z. z'f’ On * *Vo z (p 20Z ±In £ v *n 3?<P±. z T> Z ■ # 1$ Z £ % ** f’Z. =h On Z o 71 c o? x r <3> <F7 P0 72 s' t (p _z (p o o 2 >2£ <71 >t 2 2 T X -ut £ <5* tr ^a H * B’ o x *t) 8K . ? ? 5 j z •0 p 7D< $ > > \ I -* ? 27 2> 8 K Z (j-.noq) <s?jH074.93 hi> Li\s4' oF Pa^4-i£5 is -suWeof' of 4V3 ; p.cHt+?okj i\s A-S FdlLouzs ? 4OF G^bJfM^Al-. 'SGRV'I Cfc3> y soue^MMeM-F d_AiM3 PO.8(?Z-$g^0 52/ H5-4I4 ” W&S4^AO?^M&M'+ o/(>4-G i<F~ _ Z ; 7S7?S >-fOSZ R&AU PA i^4i£aS IM n2Kj'te>i^C^4U) MickeLLfc Baass 1 -Di^G-F o^ '.DCP-H OF l+XhAbHx CA&& seRVt'cexS P.O. SoXF^Tfi 3 7 M3* —Oo oo 5 AGFA M^ iq+o zOALi'F-YSKl4(z) KeNidi?A ZoLLefc u&pu+-r j>r<?<eoFo^ ^em44^ ^e>Ruic£2S 0VeR3 i UtF ACCoUMf^hrirPr" COMMAS ^0 kJ /?/Z ^Tii AT i? a M & m+o / C46 / lF-• I e J AM£ O&L&'KS Mo LoKlGe^ XJiXec-po^ oF ■rtite JS&H-.OP CAR£. SGRyrcfcs.see F&d. r. eV p-, RUL& 25 (d)^ [wJheKi PubCi'C VFFt'ce^ who T>S A lAARf-y iu AM OFPtc?AL ClAPAcr+r .. > CeAS&S +o hold oPF.ce luhi'le +U> ac+?oni i\s p&Md . M&iz) gjhe oPPicetzS access ORl‘J flu+oMA+lcALLA 5uU|-,if«ted Av5 A 5 Lt 3+ of £3 (CobH~t~^ ( 3 ) A -S. -DOoLeT 3*f?H'€ 7 OF1" cac «f» Hcao+L <£4H(H am ^seiQVites AF^HCY [&OQ tp-h ^4o/^H.460 3 AC^AMO kHo zCAUF-</.S^K£5) ZT&pp HA CO M b&F. 3ecxe?fA^r; oU?F. op Cofcteec4i'ohJS Awcj pe>hA^i Lj'fA'+'i OM ISIS H3U s+y«M ,34^n 3ACRAMei\H'o z caL?Fysg/l (H) o-bke r Fol i-H caL 3U 4?ch V i -S’ r 0 VJ3 of2 4L^; 5FAte oF CAUFb^MlAC4) 3>^~WHAS T-^FAFOM & i KfrC-t-OK CAliV. 2>ef4-. of FuUJc p.o.J3ox -TW3TI' ms-osob 3AC A M e> bHo z C AC?F -?S?77-7377 (ti) 3>cankja FouUr 3?ePuYr x>?^ec4o^ CaL^F. co&fceoiriQMAC | f-fcAL-H^ meesewtces P.OfEc?xS^5"OO eck ^eLzvFM <A3eC<sl> Ttet^ez 13 n o ” cj i Y P-eLAFed' 11 z ibj ant CouaI-^H/ va chAlLewFB 4-te a>GFA^4-Mebj4of G^Kje^AU 3e>P.vi p^o^wh z FzGluiefe H-o proc^s am4 iMounte kj<H-? c& of ttv&tK. ’M6W-tAL cVaimis } F?GeU bZ P&+i+-roKJer? . 'TAlole OF CotJ-VeN-hS T”A <b IP OF Co M-fCt^frFS zrzbJcleK TA<bl£ OfAU-Pho rQi4i £.5 9UC6-V-I OU^J fRC^KH-ed l) i-hfe OF &6MWL ^oo&^,hJ-He>r^4cL^ i'ms WWW, Fa/lu^ do process] Awal PP-ouPde |Jjod?ce] OF Fi'Led cLA i'mcs), ?m COMPL j Ai^ce uprHi dke> CAU'poP^f A G-OVO^U CLa^M sS A-Ob/FoUGi^hl » fr&oU> ?/0 (M"SO^ Z v i CLAH-^ h-Vi e I F'rh a M K)d . d u e c^ss cLAHSe^ /VC-COR cIiVjG*+© 'Hti^ Pi^fMOfpGe^ OWUMClvA'F& ’d Jm — Lofam V • 2-1 mhcrmam B^USh CO-/I0Z5.C+. Il^u^/gz) ? 1% 2^ JM^-^ci okj <suc^ £"M+&-

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2025)
2025-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2025)
2025-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2025)

Attorneys

George Hamilton
George Hamilton — Petitioner