Whether the crime of possession with intent to distribute under 21 U.S.C. §959(c)(2) applies extraterritorially and whether a non-testifying analyst's statements in a cellphone extraction report are testimonial hearsay subject to the Confrontation Clause

1. Whether the crime of possession with intent to distribute under 21 U.S.C. §959(c)(2) applies extraterritorially. 2. Whether a non-testifying analyst’s statements in a cellphone extraction report are testimonial hearsay, rather than “raw, machine-created data,” and are thus subject to the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause.