Whether the Petitioner's fundamental 5th and 14th Amendment due process rights were violated by the prosecutor's failure to prove prior judgment and sentence, by a detective's secret recording, by an allegedly insufficient fingerprint report, and by an unspecified issue related to amending a legal document

No question identified. : N | r H W» «<1 7 QUESTIONONE Was Petitioner ’s fundamental 5th and 14th Amendment r. Constitutional due process rr £ight violated by the Court when the « • ,, •/: t prosecutor failed to prove prior judgment and sentence to establish i • r by a preponderance of the evidence Fla. Statute 775.082(9)(2)(3)? Therefore sentencing Petitioner to illegally mandatory years as a Prison Releasee Reoffender. QUESTION TWO Was Petitioner ’s fundamental 5th and 14th Amendment Constitutional due process Miranda warning violated by detective Bergen secretly taped recording Mr. Hill when Mr. Hill said, “I do not want be record on tape ”? QUESTION THREE Was the Petitioner ’s fundamental 5th and 14th Amendment Constitutional due process right violated by the Trial Court when the prosecutor fingerprint report failed to show Mr. Hill presented at the crime and, therefore fail to prove an element of the crime. QUESTION FOUR Was the Petitioner ’s fundamental 5th and 14th Amendment Constitutional due process right violated id tGanir 4)^ /follwq ftfcfaiss IU6L Q'io'iw^ rWfZc I'Al/ aP oue_ OppaeW-fr-Jo amend llV2>(/££i LiOnj}" dlfipM 2i"X) -fehJ ' <lVi'^j2£_feiTe. ^idc^onJe^ MjL‘1411/ M pea <Se^ fn^M£ 4 o?