Did the Fourth Circuit err in deferring to the lower courts' findings that the petitioner was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing or relief on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel

No question identified. : fold U>oPou<fU\ Grcu'<4errin deQ/nr^ 4-0 4MDisVicf Cbur-l^ (W ’^4M-4k> ■pU'itaivo' iuas nolpce^udic^d bt^Kis defense) cdimS€^ -failure)4o recall 4 u/i-Wss uAo tuOuU hau&) im/Whed. -Uc<SWeb ide^PiGc^how Pdnkimr Alleged Whh'is deftnsoccunsel uuas in&CPed-iae -fidh'n^4o recall a Wi4neS£ 4o Crosshe) her ahu4 an 4-0 h>w\7iAjluch Seated 4M U^vicVkvx 4-eU Mr-W ho"'hlactad ou^doivVv^wimlaer id^lrh^Wve/t didd ’f evm Pw**. ^eJ\UesS also vjouU havcWitW 4h^4kxo WO ftker odpr'i4s sb<4i^ a4 ha/' hoi<se) ?4nd !a W 1*^ ivcseo hi^fvidn^, ihs a iutz^ ■ dn Cimhny d (Y^judicej, 4kL-(MkichCourV shkd in'iks o^ini^a 4W4k> 4o^vne£g^S iks"dcuHtulll( asUevwml W UAcSmi^k maMo I^WhM^Wih GrodPshW in'i4^ ©Pinithx rdioPCco/X^W 4k>feM ’iMer ‘W nd-^a^aLre^ui%iU shewing" ■$2X1 liiwf 4Kal 4U 'Tourlh &au■P 2iU 4h& IvWT CCur-k -feled Vo COrvSi/W huS V, ^wWtClwsd's 4aA Jjkw^fljuaseh aOPid^VU^oh ^4^ v\-eces^f(^-k? resolve -a -&du3i duiPukz'Ita4o«4k Ch''tu4 ftM tu?cv\ 44&iow courls -W4 41^-^-k-tiOMas cIms o-T ivxizHkckve a£siS-laueo oCcninsd lacErwiu/ko\ he a pri^ftcLedlwivi^ K\ ^CCkvil^ Ah?^ W l£ e.id<VleA 4o a <5ia l\\s -pslilitin .0(4 dfdciii&rr m de&H^ k 44*0 lew# Courk' Jhd44o -PeAiViLsxjr ip2.£ ntV einWleJi 4o m •« * IIIMi Vidvw alleged VhA Us (kPeuSC) counsel was i^eVfecVwo (a Pailiw^U fit Us ^■Ucvi k SiAiPPreis fW.St^U'-s id^liCie^Ptvx oCV^4^ his Cousin, Mf.CUeG WW W*^ 4W wUVk^irJi onUW^hV oPM mctoV.^e^W Cwrfi Ceil a^bePaulW & noVvuiWr^i^ wok'^ h> WresS. Xr 0> n\i -pr^vdi^j 4^Wk CkouiC sUd 4U ^de. i^uisiU oP a devxiel &Pa Cov\sVi4ultMal r\c^hV.Od Vk.OouflA QccuiP ex( \v\ d^fijrrii^d'D Vl<itiislricl Courfis (Wm 4V&-14he> PlViVim'^r wa^ niA V^tdiced bt^ Vi al counsel's (VU d Co fib Vks mUioA A'O SuA°r^ 44^ id^ViOlc&lriovA oC Mc-S'vxiV ? GUESmO PlteSEKTFED#H OiJ Mttih Ocud w in ckferrin^ 4o 4k, W court 4A Jte'pdUioner did rJ'Skul ceufe ox‘prejudice Porhk ftittdural dAdVZ aHB.tiA 4k,WU> Circuit awl 4k)ltw ecu A ^n<w4k_M'-liener's d«m? 'VeViVioner alle^A PfWcukr kin Io telW>ItoP h'»£ inelWwe> ^assistance, eP counsel dai'w? was maPPeM ” iw> orU nol 3 \abeM ttri!Us“issuej so hdom»Hd 4keda«^ Gw hs tmlial feb^S corns 4o W (UikmUcm r&juesW KuS Counsel to inelu^-itow in h<-s d«rec4^ter(^ cSto in leMfiTj clain^ 0^ mePPecLv/e 3tSSLS-4aAC€> ©Ccounsel ar^ no4' Cf^xreaUo ev\ aPPe-4In Pmzfcvx^nv) CaiA^of iprejuJiee> J4tofturU* Circ^I rditJ cn 4k lower cwAs uAW^n^oUwd pdi^war ^tswld hU froceJkjural ollauU. iv lO-uGSiroiUS {teENnfab &q ftUViMdr alleged WkvS defend coined was ineCMive? £r ftjbro 4o a rwlion 4o skiRjO4A^ dcdm^d hi-S cAw&s k aVWd issuer fti-kid. fU'i'iiiMor wS owicWy in lavgc Pa4j u’Pcrn 4H unreliabk; ksk^cYii^ and nwsideidiftcdim cP aajuo uuvUwS£e£/ Who u/qS hidh rf^CDCtMne) ^hd ^IwvJu irtWiceW ab-Pimo eC-fe oCfti^. QJiM.no frejudi^4teF<Mh Grcui4 rtW o«\ fc. •Dislrid'&u4s sWemwlm O^iniw dtnuiw^irdieP, -IM-'tbwSel W n4 (feAu^ -Gv ftlin^-i-s I'ncv^+oStnUo -4Me,vkdmeO on U& qroiivvi >lW Bb4h advices here/.Cid Usl WlA Circuil &jr( m Io ke “Disk'd Ceut4s JkdiiYte 4^ was hd ^cejudi^ed h'^ dtttnSb rounds Pailu</£> k? rnoi/6 Io skii<€> W Su(Sciev\6U Widened? V TOE or CCkHEMTS QllCSpiOivS FceSdlAeA; ijijii, IV/V Table, oC Co'ivknts. _ :_ _vi,vii Table; cP AulWAias L_ vni/ix,^yi Opinion fieW _ l Jun sAicAion 2 3 U,H >t5,l6 >W,2Z 3G> .la 3a .5 a 3Ha 3ua 37aZ.H JLfc _rr 31 _33S-Wutor^ gnA ConsPiluPional TVrx/isinrxsS Involve A._ CAafone^l cP"Ate, Case, Ou^sl-ions flrmb/i __._ Reasons for Cran4in^4te^\vrit TteFoucPh CteuiV im^oPojt 1deferred Ao AtetSAaAe. Courts decision -Tteteurth CccuiP nteaPPted 4te<5AantW oCTovJnSend -TU Fourth Circuit teisaiPPlieA AtesWaird of 3teidZlav\d -TteFourth Grout Amisapplied Ate, dantkrd of W^nu/ri^l/vt -TteWU CifcuA uvusaPPUeA 4V€)sW^arA of Jackson -Co n clusio n_ —-—-Woo£ pP sox view_ _ _ -— -decision ofTte U.S-CouJ oP APPC^ (fourth CiWiA^-MmoranduiM Oder oPAte. OisWuA Court-—-Me wand uw\ Opinion -Decision oP-lte, Sufrowe,CbufA flP CiteteAS CbrPus) -Docis'ien of Ate (SuPolml Cout4 of Virginia ftwn CourP of Ap