1). Whether the Out-of-Court Identification Procedures violated Petitioner's Due Process Right under Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972); Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977); and Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 (1967)?

2). Whether Petitioner's Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent was violated by the Trial Court during its jury instruction and whether the courts created an Ex Post Facto violation by utilizing instructions and cases that came after Petitioner's trial to deny him relief

3). Whether the Prosecutorial Misconduct in this case established a Napue/Giglio Violation thus violating Petitioner's Due Process Right to a Fair Trial (Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 270 (1959); Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972))? (Dist. Court Op. at 24-31)

4). The deliberate partial omission of the (12-page) 9-1-1 dispatch transcripts violated petitioner's due process right to a fair trial? (Dist. Court Op. At 31-33)

5). Whether Petitioner's arrest based on a lack of Probable Cause violated his Fourth Amendment Right to be free from Illegal Search and Seizure? (Dist. Court Op. at 33-34)

6). Whether Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel was violated when counsel misadvised and mislead Petitioner which caused Petitioner to reject a favorable plea offer? (Dist. Court Op. 34-41).

Whether multiple constitutional violations, including due process, prosecutorial misconduct, and ineffective assistance of counsel, warrant Supreme Court review of a criminal conviction