No. 25-5156

Marlin L. Royal v. Fidencio N. Guzman, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-07-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights due-process evidence-law federal-procedure hearsay
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the erroneous admission of hearsay accusatory statements prejudicially violated petitioner's federal constitutional rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether, on de novo review, the erroneous admission of hearsay accusatory statements that the prosecution’s chief witness made to the police prejudicially violated petitioner’s federal constitutional rights i

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-29
Waiver of Fidencio Guzman, Warden of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Fidencio Guzman, Warden to respond filed.
2025-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2025)

Attorneys

Fidencio Guzman, Warden
Christopher P. Beesley — Respondent
Marlin Royal
Faryar FarmaniFarmani, A Professional Law Corporation, Petitioner