Whether a federal court of appeals may refuse to enter judgment following an unrebutted dispositive appellate brief and summary judgment motion, and whether judicial refusal to perform the ministerial act of entering a perfected federal judgment violates due process and separation of powers

1. Whether a federal court of appeals may refuse to enter judgment following the unrebutted filing of a dispositive appellate brief and summary judgment motion, where default has attached under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 31(c) and Rule 56(a), and the record has been closed and perfected. 2. Whether judicial refusal to perform the ministerial act of entering a perfected federal judgment constitutes a violation of due process and separation of powers, thereby necessitating direct intervention by this Court under its supervisory authority. 3. Whether continued state enforcement actions —including financial seizure, garnishment, and retaliation —conducted after the sealing of a perfected federal record, without lawful Title IV-D authority, violate the Supremacy Clause, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and established civil rights protections under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 4. Whether the Supreme Court must enforce judgment by operation of law when a lower court refuses to do so, and whether such refusal —where procedural default and dispositive unrebutted motions exist —constitutes judicial 2 obstruction and demands constitutional correction under the All Writs Act and Article VI Supremacy enforcement.