No. 25-5169

Richard Patrick Evensen v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-07-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: force rape sexual-assault state-appellate-court substantial-evidence unconscious-state
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the record support the state appellate court's holding that substantial evidence supported a finding that petitioner used force to overcome Jane Doe Two's will and rape her by repositioning her body and inserting lubricants to maintain her unconscious state?; Does the record support the state appellate court's holding that substantial evidence supported a finding that appellant used force to continue sodomizing Jane Doe One when she woke up while he was sodomizing her in her sleep?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

ONE Does the record support the state appellate court ’s holding that substantial evidence supported a finding that petitioner used force to overcome Jane Doe Two ’s will and rape her by repositioning her body and inserting lubricants to maintain her unconscious state? QUESTION TWO Does the record support the state appellate court ’s holding that substantial evidence supported a finding that appellant used force to continue sodomizing Jane Doe One when she woke up while he was sodomizing her in her sleep?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2025)

Attorneys

Richard P. Evensen
Richard Patrick Evensen — Petitioner