Did the Fourth Circuit violate the party presentation principle, improperly circumvent AEDPA's exhaustion requirement, and flout the AEDPA merits standard in granting federal habeas relief?

, which warrant summary reversal, are as follows : 1. Did the Fourth Circuit violate the party presentation principle by granting federal habeas relief based on putative errors in the state trial proceedings that Mr. Swee ney never alleged ? 2. Did the Fourth Circuit improperly circumvent AEDPA ’s exhaustion requirement by applying a “special circumstances” exception derived from Frisbie v. Collins , 342 U.S. 519 (1952), and Granberry v. Greer , 481 U.S. 129 (1987) , that AEDPA eliminated and that has no applicability beyond the unique circumstances of those cases , as other courts of appeals have concluded ? 3. Did the Fourth Circuit flout the AEDPA merits standard by granting federal habeas relief in the absence of clearly established federal law as determined by the holdings of this Court ?