No. 25-5215
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-inference evidentiary-standard firearm-ability force-application legal-sufficiency substantial-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the record lack substantial evidence to support an inference that petitioner had the present ability to apply force with a firearm when that firearm was loaded with a single bullet that had already misfired?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Does the record lack substantial evidence to support an inference that petitioner had the present ability to apply force with a firearm when that firearm was loaded with a single bullet that had already misfired?
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-20
Waiver of California of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2025-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2025)
Attorneys
California
Darren Kyle Indermill — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Otoniel Cornejo
Otoniel Cornejo — Petitioner