No. 25-5231

Joseph-Allen Davis v. OM SRP, LLC

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2025-07-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-violation disciplinary-counsel due-process ex-parte-communication judicial-ethics recusal-standard
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is violated when a state court judge, previously disciplined for ex parte communication, engages in similar conduct in a pending matter, becomes the subject of a disciplinary complaint from a litigant in that case, and remains on the case despite a potential suspension and personal financial liability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is violated when a state court judge, previously disciplined for ex parte communication, engages in similar conduct in a pending matter, becomes the subject of a disciplinary complaint from a litigant in that case, and remains on the case despite a potential suspension and personal financial liability. Whether a state appellate court ’s refusal to substantively adjudicate a clearly presented federal constitutional claim, despite its inclusion in the record, constitutes an evasion of federal review in violation of due process under Douglas v. California and permits certiorari under Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn. i

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2025)

Attorneys

Joseph-Allen Davis
Joseph-allen Davis — Petitioner
Joseph-allen Davis — Petitioner