Whether the imposition of New York Penal Law § 60.35, as applied to Petitioner, results in state perpetrating extrinsic fraud and violates due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment when Petitioner was not provided notice or opportunity to be heard concerning the mandatory monetary assessment

No question identified. : Questions PPiESemtej > W imposition rf Itew WK Penal Law § b0.35 , suM«ont ) as-applied to Petitioner result in State pupdratin^ extrinsic fraud upon Petitioner 2L Was Itew WK Penal Law f faO.35^ suWLm, original^ entitled Mandatorj pwl+ij assessmnt r^ulrdl in certain cases 4,' presently 'Cnti+kd 'MandAnj Surcharge, and enwe, victim as-appW +a Pd'Hiwr viohtM orf Ku riojbt to hutProdiM under tht fourWnth ftMCnfent ot UniW States Constitution whw Petitioner was neither provided notice nor opportunity to be heard concerning Monetary exaction said statute called for ?