No. 25-5248

In Re Quay Phipps

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: article-i-powers congressional-power constitutional-interpretation habeas-corpus subject-matter-jurisdiction tenth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is petitioner entitled to immediate habeas corpus relief due to alleged lack of congressional jurisdiction under Article I, Section 8?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Is petitioner entitled to immediate relief, including habeas corpus, due to the government's lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution? 2. Does Congress have the power to regulate people and/or artificial persons not enumerated under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution in violation of the Tenth Amendment? 3. Does the Tenth Amendment's enumeration requirement prohibit Congress from punishing people through the power of Article I, Section 8, Clause 3? As the power to punish is enumerated under Clauses 6 and 10. 4. Are the Courts and Department of Justice committing fraud by and upon the Courts (respectfully) by exercising a power not enumerated to Congress, therefore not delegatable? 5. Are the Courts and Department of Justice committing fraud by and upon the Courts by exercising jurisdiction outside of Article I, Section 8, Clause 17? 6. Are motions to the Court held to a "first in, first ruled upon" standard? 7. Does the First Amendment invalidate the Anti-Terrorism Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) by stating, "Congress shall make no law . . . and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-04-29

Attorneys

Quay Phipps
Quay Phipps — Petitioner
Quay Phipps — Petitioner