Did the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division properly apply legal standards in reviewing the family court's custody and support determinations for Alex Anderson and Mariah Casey

No question identified. : Qu<3ShcW) PfegenfM strict MVorcJjlv aJi ^ko) » c@s iodiccrl® Mqq 19 aoluXi No. ('S-^Oq®.H> w i(1(:1|x Nq. ,5^oq| g^<x Q.<s',Didin !+ -tfie Court permit #w Q-g: An® ■+ Court panel ot July IA AMI CnwpT To redo off urao dtie loW rad IWfe°F inq bs©M wrawp'? AnU b\A frQGtfQ© op QTO PUOSUG(<TOO iqiOA 3c^4Q4-R@P10V@d 1 Q3 iSGp^titfOUS . ta3 Supr@M@ cooot Rol© 4.uQ) Q WQSKPt -flqg opioiofi op 'fhlS QdOff OiTW G6S@ Nq, K’rqoqft & $_W "tote/ ILS, ft^c^toGG?/ Q& biM Co# hold Hodges ,W 8<M@ w 5QNC^ O>W NON-r^ition IQQ^p S^iK/ MlilK Ma^i ’qg^S bg >© ^crfetsioL pqef op ambifcf foN; Qw i/w@ idenhcob joo ptw beeacl wam(]@s ■ Q7; Rwovod qs repot/foog, gm SupWiQ GoMRulb lU-JCQ). qAU Tm QCQoipdi<3ip<3<3 lA/iiin TitL© u.s.s. goctioN Wd) <c iWt it Q moto op a poet ■Wat, Wo tfwlw of judges too canstitore a quomro utndQtf u.g.caiG) section w) is W<3@ (3) £ ’> Q.'0;.Wa^t th© OtfoW 1% <W suUing p@metuat@d without oppgat op Law $ k IF W6tf OCtoW 6)1.) 30(31 Judg^mt N ©ssocice psnud coiww upotn -Hnc cooiyt t . -Q>-® :Iki. tt)@ (JaiW States Court .of; App©oLS Foo' Tino F@wgl CmuT <c isisvt it W2 ibot a Qlwom under op 'tosw (§>) oo o)ore duqges g * q Shouldn ’t The idling end Gision op Al©x Aoteoh Jn and WiQh AnW cw/ ’s iranpwio be consfd@ired A Tfruo kxkvow» P-vutWu xvfe) Sutpaisf v,