No. 25-5264

Craig Alan Sandhaus v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-08-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance jury-instruction nondeadly-force sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Petitioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when his trial attorneys failed to request a jury instruction on the justifiable use of nondeadly force

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether the Petitioner’s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when his trial attorneys failed to request a jury instruction on the justifiable use of nondeadly force , which was a defense support ed by the evi dence at trial, and which gave the Petitioner the best chance to prevail at trial . iii B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iv C.

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-09-03
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2025-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 3, 2025)
2025-07-14
Application (25A56) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 29, 2025.
2025-06-30
Application (25A56) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 29, 2025 to July 29, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Craig Sandhaus
William R. PonallPonall Law, Petitioner
William R. PonallPonall Law, Petitioner
Florida
Rebecca Rock McGuiganOffice of Florida Attorney General, Respondent
Rebecca Rock McGuiganOffice of Florida Attorney General, Respondent