No. 25-5264
Craig Alan Sandhaus v. Florida
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance jury-instruction nondeadly-force sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when his trial attorneys failed to request a jury instruction on the justifiable use of nondeadly force
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the Petitioner’s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when his trial attorneys failed to request a jury instruction on the justifiable use of nondeadly force , which was a defense support ed by the evi dence at trial, and which gave the Petitioner the best chance to prevail at trial . iii B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iv C.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-09-03
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2025-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 3, 2025)
2025-07-14
Application (25A56) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 29, 2025.
2025-06-30
Application (25A56) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 29, 2025 to July 29, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Florida
Rebecca Rock McGuigan — Office of Florida Attorney General, Respondent
Rebecca Rock McGuigan — Office of Florida Attorney General, Respondent