No. 25-5277
Oliser Hernandez-Villalobos v. United States
Tags: brady-v-maryland constitutional-rights due-process exculpatory-evidence speedy-trial unlawful-seizure
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a judge may force an accused to choose between his due process right to exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland or his constitutional rights to a speedy trial and to avoid unlawful seizure
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether a judge may force an accused to choose between his due process right to exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1969), or his constitutional rights to a speedy trial and to avoid unlawful seizure. prefix PARTIES,
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2025)
Attorneys
Oliser Hernandez-Villalobos
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent