No. 25-5277

Oliser Hernandez-Villalobos v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: brady-v-maryland constitutional-rights due-process exculpatory-evidence speedy-trial unlawful-seizure
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a judge may force an accused to choose between his due process right to exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland or his constitutional rights to a speedy trial and to avoid unlawful seizure

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether a judge may force an accused to choose between his due process right to exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1969), or his constitutional rights to a speedy trial and to avoid unlawful seizure. prefix PARTIES,

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2025)

Attorneys

Oliser Hernandez-Villalobos
Kara Lee HartzlerFederal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
Kara Lee HartzlerFederal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent