Whether a federal employee's speech reporting unsafe conditions and potential misconduct is protected under the First Amendment and whether agency retaliation violated constitutional protections

1. Whether a federal employee's speech —reporting unsafe school conditions, unauthorized personnel practices, and retaliation to oversight bodies —is protected under the First Amendment, and whether the agency ’s retaliation and judicial suppression of that speech violated constitutional protections. 2. Whether a federal agency ’s misclassification of employment status in violation of 62 BIAM § 11.25 and misuse of the probationary framework —used to justify termination and deny procedural rights — violated Petitioner ’s Fifth Amendment due process rights. 3. Whether an Administrative Judge ’s suppression of material evidence, manipulation of testimony, and disregard of agency regulations constitutes judicial misconduct and fraud on the tribunal requiring vacatur of the proceedings under Hazel-Atlas and Brady v. Maryland. 4. Whether the Federal Circuit ’s summary affirmance without opinion, in a case raising serious constitutional, regulatory, and whistleblower claims, contravened its duty of meaningful review under Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, thereby enabling systemic due process violations. 1