No. 25-5317

Stephen Corey Bryant v. Joel Anderson, Acting Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance martinez-rule post-conviction-counsel procedural-default
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference: 2025-10-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Fourth Circuit err when it denied a certificate of appealability on Bryant's claim that post-conviction counsel's deficient performance establishes cause for the procedural default under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

When a district court dismisses a federal habeas petition, a circuit court must issue a certificate of appealability for any claim in the petition whose dismissal is debatable among reasonable jurists. In contravention of this Court’s precedent, Bryant’s capital trial counsel failed to conduct a reasonable investigation and neither discovered nor presented available mitigating evidence of Bryant’s brain damage from exposure to alcohol in utero, which substantially impaired his capacity to conform his conduc t to the requirements of the law. Bryant’s post -conviction counsel then failed to pursue relief based on sentencing counsel’s deficient investigation. Did the Fourth Circuit err when it denied a certificate of appealability on Bryant’s claim that post -conv iction counsel’s deficient performance establishes cause for the procedural default under Martinez v. Ryan , 566 U.S. 1 (2012)? ii STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES Bryant v. Stirling , No. 23 -4, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Judgment entered January 27, 2025. Bryant v. Stirling , No. 9:16 -cv-01423, U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina. Judgment entered October 19, 2022. Bryant v. State, No. 2019 -000610, Supreme Court of South Carolina. Petition for a writ of certiorari denied May 11, 2021. Bryant v. State, No. 2016 -CP-43-828, Court of Common Pleas for Sumter County, South Carolina. Judgment entered January 4, 2019. Bryant v. State, No. 2016 -002228, Supreme Court of South Carolina. Judgment entered Feb ruary 9, 2017. Bryant v. State, No. 2016 -CP-43-829, Court of Common Pleas for Sumter County, South Carolina. Judgment entered July 15, 2016. Bryant v. South Carolina , No. 15 –6215, Supreme Court of the United States. Petition for a writ of certiorari denied Nov ember 30, 2015. Bryant v. State, No. 2013 -000518, Supreme Court of South Carolina. Petition for a writ of certiorari denied March 4, 2015. Bryant v. State, No. 201l -CP-43-00901, Court of Common Pleas for Sumter County, South Carolina. Judgment entered February 14, 2013. State v. Bryant , No. 2008 -103130, Supreme Court of South Carolina. Judgment entered January 7, 2011. State v. Bryant , No. 2006 -GS-43-000699, Court of Common Pleas for Sumter County, South Carolina. Judgment entered September 11, 2008.

Docket Entries

2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-23
Reply of Stephen Bryant submitted.
2025-09-23
Reply of petitioner Stephen Bryant filed. (Distributed)
2025-09-10
Brief of Joel Anderson, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-09-10
Brief of respondents Joel Anderson, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 10, 2025)
2025-05-28
Application (24A1150) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 7, 2025.
2025-05-21
Application (24A1150) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 8, 2025 to August 7, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Joel Anderson, et al.
Melody Jane BrownSouth Carolina Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Stephen Bryant
Gretchen Leigh SwiftFederal Public Defender, Petitioner