No. 25-5328
Ayana Saunders v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in finding that the proof at trial did not result in a Constructive Amendment or Variance from the Indictment and whether venue was proper in the Western District of Tennessee
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in finding that the proof at trial did not result in a Constructive Amendment or Variance from the Indictment? II. Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in finding that venue was proper in the Western District of Tennessee?
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 11, 2025)
2025-06-02
Application (24A1182) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until August 8, 2025.
2025-05-29
Application (24A1182) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 9, 2025 to August 8, 2025, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Ayana Saunders
Mark Edwin Brown — Menefee & Brown, P.C., Petitioner
Mark Edwin Brown — Menefee & Brown, P.C., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent