Whether the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a detention without reasonable suspicion and whether the court improperly precluded discussion of other-acts evidence during voir dire

I. Mr. Underwood challenged his se izure and search because there was no reasonable suspicion to ju stify the detention and search. Did the court err in denyin g the motion to suppress? II. During voir dire, the court proh ibited counsel from addressing the topic of other-acts eviden ce. Did the court improperly preclude this topic?