I. Mr. Underwood challenged his seizure and search because there was no reasonable suspicion to justify the detention and search. Did the court err in denying the motion to suppress?

II. During voir dire, the court prohibited counsel from addressing the topic of other-acts evidence. Did the court improperly preclude this topic?

Whether the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a detention without reasonable suspicion and whether the court improperly precluded discussion of other-acts evidence during voir dire