Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is constitutional under the Second Amendment, whether Stinson v. United States accurately states deference to Federal Sentencing Guidelines Commentary, and whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) is facially unconstitutional for criminalizing firearm possession based on interstate travel

I. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment? II. Whether Stinson v. United States still accurately state the level of deference due to the Commentary of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines? III. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional?