No. 25-5362

Nathaniel Blancher v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure evidentiary-hearing guilty-plea ineffective-assistance plea-agreement
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a guilty plea becomes knowing, intelligent, and voluntary when the plea agreement inaccurately describes the penalty provision of the statute at issue which defendant avers his counsel also misadvised him on -inducing the guilty plea -and whether such a claim requires a response from the government and an evidentiary hearing, when the defendant claims he would have insisted on going to trial but for counsel's misadvise and the inaccurately described penalty provision

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. :

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2025)

Attorneys

Nathaniel Blancher
Nathaniel David Blancher — Petitioner
Nathaniel David Blancher — Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent