Whether California's Assault Weapon Control Act is constitutional and whether various procedural and constitutional violations occurred in the prosecution of a firearm-related case

|. Is California's Assault Weapon Control Act: §30605, §30600, §30800 & §30950 constitutional, especially when Prosecution "Firearm Expert" conceded that my AR-1 5 is suitable for self-defense? ||. Are FIREARM ACCESSORIES are constitutionally protected in any significant capacity? —Are such Mallus Prohibitum schemes unconstitutional both facially and especially as-applied to me? |||. Is it acceptable that rapacious circumvention of 4th amendment rights aggravated my predicament by enabling those charges to even exist? |V. Is my rifle an "assault weapon" if it did NOT exhibit the features §5471 (z) & (oo), whilst prosecution also failed to prove it was Semiautomatic §5471 (hh) and Centerfire §5471 (j)? Is entrapment via Provocation on §422 & amidst a personal frolic OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT? V. Is it a Violation of Due Process & Entrapment by CADOJ because I could not register my rifle as an "assault weapon"? V|. Are Appellate judgements valid when Lacking Subject-Matter jurisdiction because the panel was haplessly ignorant of firearm mechanics & features in defiance of Cargill v. Garland (VanDyke Dissent Video)? V||. Was it a severe violation of 5th Amendment that Defense Counsel #167626, overconfident of victory, prevented me from testifying at trial and refused to promulgate all my arguments? V|||. Is it acceptable that Appellate Panel perniciously evaded constitutional challenge against §30605 etc. by claiming my incompetent attorney failed to raise it prior to Bruen being decided, when in fact I told her multiple times to raise a Second Amendment challenge? X. Was it improper to disqualify jurors based on firearms knowledge and autism expertise? XL Does blatantly disregarding the Intersection of Severe Autism (Mental Illness) with Mens Rea Culpability create a FATAL REHAIF ERROR in the context of firearm prosecutions both criminal & civil? X||. Was Probable Cause non-existent for original 6/10/19 warrant because the §422 charge upon which it is predicated got struck down by the same judge who approved that objectively ridiculous warrant? X|||. Should all evidence acquired through invalid search warrants (such as the 6/10/19 abomination issued against me) be suppressed pursuant to Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine, under 4th amendment & any charges derived from that accursed warrant irrevocably dismissed?