Does a state prisoner's conviction violate due process when trial counsel provides ineffective assistance through erroneous jury instructions

t^VA jo pAVcrA "Me GovemmenA anl Me flnieA rr)en~f n^M"M J, cinooSe. 4t> use leyA glSl&inct. 4o comply unM lU Rr$A rfme^AmenV t^VA jo pAVcrA "Me GovemmenA anl Me ‘RurleenHa flhleA rr)en~f n^M" 4t> a^(z&le ; effiecltue an! weaning l<A &C&6S Io Me cuir~K f ^nJ Me jean USSisAwg. ^rl>)be pnjvnAes me^hAioe^ erf^e^QS^ JAietenA iue leyA QtSSisUnCe AmV resulVs |y\ a pn^AmA AeCfrul^ is He ce^ ^ulA er5 Hg s meCamAAuAuwal yioUlloY) of an AcfaalA Un A YA PREJUDICE AtxoH cuhen deSifeA 4t> bring has ke&n Icg^ rejeAel or preugrAec Capak) £ 4 of ti inq t e(ain/.s) D4$ been hirt erej an lor /yviaezXSS Ao Me QeurVs Cw4»~UU CftUSE. 4o g/-^u Sc 0^ pnxAura t icner QuESTloH^ PRESENTED lorari tt fr> CREDP/D I" > Q) tiiere is no rwdd&r<j lxir4rg»i seeking ggdh fCVieu) * 6?) "H)g A/.C CcnslAui(on gn 1 Ik M.C. 5uj?re»rig CcurA olleAOS peA-nign iaas mnbiyious as it> The reason -for dismissal J (I) Supreme Courts 0<4ex noi sW< ~Hie appeal t^S <Lsr»>.IS a Timebj -Viied fetn*^ Cgur\ ad Qpipli&Aibfl ■fcr $4<A k)Akn ilk yn&tniria aV U.S.C,^ 6)^^ u>Kcl> 4oIls ’Hie oneine. f>a. $4cAe-|guJ<~Q/\ Cl rcTrhawer VOYuncj s-|a|c Ccur 4t>< •nlinej in 4)^e lorimg -PorurM, J Does a sIcAe. prtsoDgr j£cti£_b IS b^. -fpllfeUiid^ m^ruA^lS^ dlbtt ’f er rone cms insirHcl/g^Sj an