Whether an entity that purposefully and continuously operates a website serving residents of a forum thereby 'expressly aim' at the forum for purposes of specific personal jurisdiction, and whether the preponderance standard is the proper standard of proof in pretrial personal jurisdiction hearings

1. The Court should grant review to resolve a circuit split on a vital jurisdictional question for the digital age: Does an entity that purposefully and continuously operates a website serving residents of a forum thereby “expressly aim” at the forum for purposes of specific personal jurisdiction? 2. Is the preponderance standard the proper standard of proof in pretrial personal jurisdiction hearings?