No. 25-5426
Reginald Bertram Johnson v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review confrontation-clause constitutional-rights fair-trial sixth-amendment trial-court
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2025-12-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred by denying Appellant's appeal without addressing the state trial court's violation of Appellant's Sixth Amendment confrontation rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
The following question stems from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ’ Published Opinion regarding claims asserted by Mr. Johnson. 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeal for The Eleventh Circuit erred by denying Appellant ’s appeal without addressing whether the state trial court ’s violation of Appellant ’s confrontation rights under the Sixth Amendment U.S.C.A denied Appellant of a fair and impartial trial.
Docket Entries
2025-12-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent Ricky D. Dixon to respond filed.
2025-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2025)
Attorneys
Ricky D. Dixon
Sonya Roebuck Horbelt — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Sonya Roebuck Horbelt — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent