Whether a brief, unverified proximity of a drug dealer to a citizen's residence, without any observed interaction, constitutes sufficient probable cause for a Fourth Amendment search warrant

Under the Fourth Amendment, is there a sufficient nexus to support probable cause to search a citizen ’s house when a drug dealer briefly parks near the citizen ’s house and nobody is observed to go in or out of the citizen ’s house or interact with the drug dealer in any way? PARTIES State of Indiana, Indiana Attorney General, IGC-South, 5th Floor, 302 W. Washington St., Indianapolis, IN 46204-2770. Jason Cornell Matlock, #222451, Indiana State Prison, One Park Row, Michigan City, IN 46360. STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS State of Indiana v. Jason Cornell Matlock, Marion County Superior Court #32, Cause No. Matlock ’s Motion to Suppress was denied on 11-15-2023. State of Indiana v. Jason Cornell Matlock, Marion County Superior Court #32, Cause No. Matlock was found guilty by a jury on 11-22-2023. Jason Cornell Matlock v. State of Indiana, Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 24A-CR-718, affirmed the conviction on 2-11-2025. Matlock v State, 255 N.E.3d 455 (Ind. Ct. App. Unpub. 2025). Jason Cornell Matlock v State of Indiana, Indiana Supreme Court, no. 24A-CR-718, Matlock ’s Petition to Transfer was denied on 5-15-2025. Matlock v State, 2025 Ind. Lexis 296. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT Transfer was denied by Indiana ’s highest court on 5-15-2025, making this Petition for Writ of Certiorari due no later than 8-13-2025. Jurisdiction is conferred by 28 U.S.C.S. §2254. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION U.S. Constitution, Fourth Amendment: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ” 3